I need the questions answered, their are 4 questions … I have provided the case study PLEASE PROVIDE FULL DETAIL EXPLANATION THAT ANSWERS THE QUESTIONS BEING ASKED

I need the questions answered, their are 4 questions … I have provided the case study PLEASE PROVIDE FULL DETAIL EXPLANATION THAT ANSWERS THE QUESTIONS BEING ASKED
Questions on Sidanius and Veniegas (2000) reading: 1. What is a patriarchal hierarchy and what is an arbitrary-set hierarchy? I am not asking for you to list the five distinctions between them (although these are important), but please simply tell me what each is. 2. Please discuss the double jeopardy and subordinate male target hypotheses. First, what are each of these. Next, what predictions does each make with regard to discrimination against males and females from subordinate groups? Finally, according to the authors, which hypothesis has the most evidence in support of it? 3. In the section titled “Evolutionary Psychology Perspectives,” the authors discuss Parental Investment Theory (Trivers, 1972). Please discuss how parental investment theory may help to explain the types of discrimination engaged in by males with regard to both patriarchy and arbitrary set discrimination. This is all discussed in that section. 4. In that same section, the authors contend that patriarchy is a form of intersexual competition (not to be confused with intersexual selection, which we discussed earlier in the term), whereas arbitrary set hierarchy is a form of intrasexual competition. They further assert that arbitrary set discrimination is more aggressive in nature whereas patriarchy is more about control. Please explain what the authors mean by this. I understand that there may be some overlap in your responses to questions 3 and 4.