1. Please share your thoughts on different funding means for the program you designed for your SLP.At a minimum, use the course readings to support your response. Other peer-reviewed materials may also be used to supplement the response. Please be sure to include references at the end of your posting. (250 words)
2. Given the readings and assignments in the course:
- Identify and briefly discuss two concepts in this course that you believe will be most applicable to the professional discipline you will enter upon completion of your degree program.
- What is the importance of these concepts to the professional discipline?
- How will you use these concepts in your future career?
Optional: Offer feedback on how the course and/or facilitation of the course can be improved.
Reflection is a mental process that challenges you to use critical thinking to examine the course information, analyze it carefully, make connections with previous knowledge and experience, and draw conclusions based on the resulting ideas. A well-cultivated critical thinker raises vital questions and problems, formulating them clearly and precisely; gathers and assesses relevant information, using abstract ideas to interpret it effectively; comes to well-reasoned conclusions and solutions, testing them against relevant criteria and standards; thinks open-mindedly within alternative systems of thought, recognizing and assessing, as need be, their assumptions, implications, and practical consequences; and communicates effectively with others in figuring out solutions to complex problems. (Paul & Elder, 2008)
In order to earn maximum credit, the comment should be more than your opinion, and more than a quick “off the top of your head” response. Be sure to support your statements, cite sources properly, cite within the text of your comments, and list your reference(s). The response must be a minimum of 250 words.
1. Please share your thoughts on different funding means for the program you designed for your SLP.At a minimum, use the course readings to support your response. Other peer-reviewed materials may als
Module 4 – Background HEALTH PROMOTION PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION Required Reading Bere, E., Veierod, M. B., Bjelland, M., & Klepp K. I. (2006). Outcome and process evaluation of a Norwegian school-randomized fruit and vegetable intervention: Fruits and Vegetables Make the Marks (FVMM). Health Education Research, 21 (2) 258-267. Available in the Trident Online Library. Identification and Allocation of Resources [PowerPoint presentation]. (n.d.). Unite for Sight. (n.d.). Challenges and failures of health fairs and community screenings. Retrieved from http://www.uniteforsight.org/health-screenings/health-screenings World Health Association-Europe. (2001). Evaluation in health promotion: Principles and perspectives.Retrieved from http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/108934/E73455.pdf